Granite 4.2 30B vs Ministral 3 14B
Which is better for the money: Granite 4.2 30B by IBM or Ministral 3 14B by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Granite 4.2 30B scores 6.7 points higher (12.7 vs 6.0) but costs 3.0× as much to run the benchmark ($111 vs $37.6; mid-range vs budget cost classes). Pick Granite 4.2 30B when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Ministral 3 14B.
| Metric | Granite 4.2 30B | Ministral 3 14B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 12.7 | 6.0 | −52.8% Ministral 3 14B is 52.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $110.83 | $37.56 | −66.1% Ministral 3 14B is 66.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 65.19s | 8.02s | −87.7% Ministral 3 14B is 87.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.16 / $0.65 | $0.20 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Ministral 3 14B vs Granite 4.2 30B: 52.8% less intelligence, 66.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 87.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Granite 4.2 30B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
- Ministral 3 14B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
Granite 4.2 30BMinistral 3 14BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/granite-4-2-30b/ministral-3-14b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/granite-4-2-30b/ministral-3-14b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill