Granite 4.2 30B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Granite 4.2 30B by IBM or Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) scores 0.1 points higher (12.8 vs 12.7) but costs 12× as much to run the benchmark ($1319 vs $111; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) when you need intelligence above 12.7, and Granite 4.2 30B when 12.7 is enough.
| Metric | Granite 4.2 30B | Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 12.7 | 12.8 | +0.8% Nemotron 3 Super 120B… is 0.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $110.83 | $1,318.62 | +1089.8% Nemotron 3 Super 120B… is 12× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 63.69s | 16.78s | −73.7% Nemotron 3 Super 120B… is 73.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.16 / $0.65 | $0.30 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) vs Granite 4.2 30B: 0.8% more intelligence, 1089.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 73.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Granite 4.2 30B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Granite 4.2 30BNemotron 3 Super 120B A12B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/granite-4-2-30b/nvidia-nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/granite-4-2-30b/nvidia-nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill