Granite 4.2 30B vs Solar Pro 4
Which is better for the money: Granite 4.2 30B by IBM or Solar Pro 4 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Solar Pro 4 scores 13.9 points higher (26.6 vs 12.7) but costs 6.6× as much to run the benchmark ($737 vs $111; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Solar Pro 4 when you need intelligence above 12.7, and Granite 4.2 30B when 12.7 is enough.
| Metric | Granite 4.2 30B | Solar Pro 4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 12.7 | 26.6 | +109.4% Solar Pro 4 is 2.1× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $110.83 | $736.82 | +564.8% Solar Pro 4 is 6.6× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 51.51s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.16 / $0.65 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Solar Pro 4 vs Granite 4.2 30B: 109.4% more intelligence, 564.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Granite 4.2 30B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
- Solar Pro 4 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Granite 4.2 30BSolar Pro 4Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/granite-4-2-30b/solar-pro4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/granite-4-2-30b/solar-pro4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill