Grok 4.3 (High) vs Solar Pro 3
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.3 (High) by SpaceXAI or Solar Pro 3 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.3 (High) scores 17.1 points higher (24.9 vs 7.8) but costs 2.3× as much to run the benchmark ($363 vs $159; both mid-range class). Pick Grok 4.3 (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Solar Pro 3.
| Metric | Grok 4.3 (High) | Solar Pro 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.9 | 7.8 | −68.7% Solar Pro 3 is 68.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $363.24 | $159.22 | −56.2% Solar Pro 3 is 56.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 24.88s | 18.89s | −24.1% Solar Pro 3 is 24.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $2.50 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Solar Pro 3 vs Grok 4.3 (High): 68.7% less intelligence, 56.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 24.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.3 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Solar Pro 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
Grok 4.3 (High)Solar Pro 3Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-3/solar-pro-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-3/solar-pro-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill