Grok 4.6 (Low) vs Grok 4.6 (Medium)
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.6 (Low) by SpaceXAI or Grok 4.6 (Medium) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.6 (Medium) scores 7.7 points higher (42.8 vs 35.1) but costs 2.5× as much to run the benchmark ($1557 vs $614; both premium class). Pick Grok 4.6 (Medium) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Grok 4.6 (Low).
| Metric | Grok 4.6 (Low) | Grok 4.6 (Medium) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 35.1 | 42.8 | +21.9% Grok 4.6 (Medium) is 21.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $613.92 | $1,557.04 | +153.6% Grok 4.6 (Medium) is 2.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.36s | 31.56s | +136.2% Grok 4.6 (Medium) is 136.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.6 (Medium) vs Grok 4.6 (Low): 21.9% more intelligence, 153.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 136.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.6 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Grok 4.6 (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Grok 4.6 (Low)Grok 4.6 (Medium)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-low/grok-4-6-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-low/grok-4-6-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill