Grok 4.6 (Low) vs MiMo-V2.5
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.6 (Low) by SpaceXAI or MiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.6 (Low) scores 13.3 points higher (35.1 vs 21.8) but costs 9.9× as much to run the benchmark ($614 vs $61.9; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.6 (Low) when you need intelligence above 21.8, and MiMo-V2.5 when 21.8 is enough.
| Metric | Grok 4.6 (Low) | MiMo-V2.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 35.1 | 21.8 | −37.9% MiMo-V2.5 is 37.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $613.92 | $61.93 | −89.9% MiMo-V2.5 is 89.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.36s | 41.73s | +212.4% MiMo-V2.5 is 212.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.13 / $0.27 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
MiMo-V2.5 vs Grok 4.6 (Low): 37.9% less intelligence, 89.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 212.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.6 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- MiMo-V2.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
Grok 4.6 (Low)MiMo-V2.5Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-low/mimo-v2-5-0424 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-low/mimo-v2-5-0424?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill