Grok 4.6 (Low) vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.6 (Low) by SpaceXAI or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.6 (Low) scores 8.6 points higher (35.1 vs 26.5) but costs 2.2× as much to run the benchmark ($614 vs $283; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Grok 4.6 (Low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Nemotron 3.5 Super VL.
| Metric | Grok 4.6 (Low) | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 35.1 | 26.5 | −24.5% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 24.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $613.92 | $282.51 | −54.0% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 54.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.17s | 6.20s | −52.9% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 52.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.23 / $0.57 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Grok 4.6 (Low): 24.5% less intelligence, 54.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 52.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.6 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Grok 4.6 (Low)Nemotron 3.5 Super VLToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-low/nemotron-3-5-super-vl · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-low/nemotron-3-5-super-vl?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill