Grok 4.6 (Medium) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.6 (Medium) by SpaceXAI or Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) scores 5.3 points higher (48.1 vs 42.8) but costs 1.3× as much to run the benchmark ($2000 vs $1557; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Grok 4.6 (Medium).
| Metric | Grok 4.6 (Medium) | Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.8 | 48.1 | +12.4% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 12.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,557.04 | $2,000.35 | +28.5% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 28.5% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 31.56s | 84.79s | +168.7% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 168.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) vs Grok 4.6 (Medium): 12.4% more intelligence, 28.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 168.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.6 (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Grok 4.6 (Medium)Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-medium/muse-spark-1-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-medium/muse-spark-1-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill