Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) vs Grok 4.7 (Low)
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) by SpaceXAI or Grok 4.7 (Low) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) scores 2.0 points higher (44.2 vs 42.2) but costs 1.4× as much to run the benchmark ($2242 vs $1631; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Grok 4.7 (Low).
| Metric | Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) | Grok 4.7 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 44.2 | 42.2 | −4.5% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 4.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,241.91 | $1,630.69 | −27.3% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 27.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 32.45s | 11.28s | −65.2% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 65.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (Low) vs Grok 4.6 (Xhigh): 4.5% less intelligence, 27.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 65.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.6 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- Grok 4.7 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Grok 4.6 (Xhigh)Grok 4.7 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-xhigh/grok-4-7-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6-xhigh/grok-4-7-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill