Grok 4.6 (High) vs Grok 4.6 (Low)
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.6 (High) by SpaceXAI or Grok 4.6 (Low) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.6 (High) scores 9.2 points higher (44.3 vs 35.1) but costs 3.2× as much to run the benchmark ($1963 vs $614; both premium class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.6 (High) when you need intelligence above 35.1, and Grok 4.6 (Low) when 35.1 is enough.
| Metric | Grok 4.6 (High) | Grok 4.6 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 44.3 | 35.1 | −20.8% Grok 4.6 (Low) is 20.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,962.90 | $613.92 | −68.7% Grok 4.6 (Low) is 68.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 34.90s | 13.64s | −60.9% Grok 4.6 (Low) is 60.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.6 (Low) vs Grok 4.6 (High): 20.8% less intelligence, 68.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 60.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.6 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Grok 4.6 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
Grok 4.6 (High)Grok 4.6 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6/grok-4-6-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6/grok-4-6-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill