Grok 4.6 (High) vs Ling 3.1 Flash
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.6 (High) by SpaceXAI or Ling 3.1 Flash by InclusionAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.6 (High) scores 3.2 points higher (44.3 vs 41.1) but costs 1.9× as much to run the benchmark ($1963 vs $1015; both premium class). Pick Grok 4.6 (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Ling 3.1 Flash.
| Metric | Grok 4.6 (High) | Ling 3.1 Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 44.3 | 41.1 | −7.2% Ling 3.1 Flash is 7.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,962.90 | $1,014.56 | −48.3% Ling 3.1 Flash is 48.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 33.04s | 13.64s | −58.7% Ling 3.1 Flash is 58.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.30 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Ling 3.1 Flash vs Grok 4.6 (High): 7.2% less intelligence, 48.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 58.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.6 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Ling 3.1 Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Grok 4.6 (High)Ling 3.1 FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6/ling-3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6/ling-3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill