Grok 4.6 (High) vs Qwen3.8 Max
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.6 (High) by SpaceXAI or Qwen3.8 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Grok 4.6 (High)
Qwen3.8 Max vs Grok 4.6 (High): 9.3% less intelligence, 61.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 98.1% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Grok 4.6 (High) | Qwen3.8 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 44.3 | 40.2 | −9.3% Qwen3.8 Max is 9.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,962.90 | $3,172.37 | +61.6% Qwen3.8 Max is 61.6% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 31.72s | 62.83s | +98.1% Qwen3.8 Max is 98.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.6 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.8 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
Grok 4.6 (High)Qwen3.8 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6/qwen3-8-max-0803 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-6/qwen3-8-max-0803?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill