Grok 4.7 (High) vs Grok 4.7 (Low)
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.7 (High) by SpaceXAI or Grok 4.7 (Low) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (High) scores 4.1 points higher (46.3 vs 42.2) but costs 2.4× as much to run the benchmark ($3881 vs $1631; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Grok 4.7 (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Grok 4.7 (Low).
| Metric | Grok 4.7 (High) | Grok 4.7 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 46.3 | 42.2 | −8.9% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 8.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,880.88 | $1,630.69 | −58.0% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 58.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 30.44s | 12.90s | −57.6% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 57.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (Low) vs Grok 4.7 (High): 8.9% less intelligence, 58.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 57.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.7 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- Grok 4.7 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Grok 4.7 (High)Grok 4.7 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-high/grok-4-7-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-high/grok-4-7-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill