Grok 4.7 (High) vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.7 (High) by SpaceXAI or MiniMax-M3.1-Flash by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (High) scores 3.6 points higher (46.3 vs 42.7) but costs 14× as much to run the benchmark ($3881 vs $283; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.7 (High) when you need intelligence above 42.7, and MiniMax-M3.1-Flash when 42.7 is enough.
| Metric | Grok 4.7 (High) | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 46.3 | 42.7 | −7.8% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 7.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,880.88 | $283.18 | −92.7% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 92.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 30.44s | 22.73s | −25.3% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 25.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Grok 4.7 (High): 7.8% less intelligence, 92.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 25.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.7 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Grok 4.7 (High)MiniMax-M3.1-FlashToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-high/minimax-m3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-high/minimax-m3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill