Grok 4.7 (High) vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.7 (High) by SpaceXAI or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 6.1 points higher (52.4 vs 46.3) but costs 1.5× as much to run the benchmark ($5787 vs $3881; both flagship class). Pick Muse Wonder (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Grok 4.7 (High).
| Metric | Grok 4.7 (High) | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 46.3 | 52.4 | +13.2% Muse Wonder (Max) is 13.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,880.88 | $5,786.78 | +49.1% Muse Wonder (Max) is 49.1% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 26.80s | 43.73s | +63.2% Muse Wonder (Max) is 63.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs Grok 4.7 (High): 13.2% more intelligence, 49.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 63.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.7 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Grok 4.7 (High)Muse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-high/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-high/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill