Grok 4.7 (Low) vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.7 (Low) by SpaceXAI or Kimi K3.1 Pro by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 12.9 points higher (55.1 vs 42.2) but costs 1.9× as much to run the benchmark ($3117 vs $1631; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Kimi K3.1 Pro when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Grok 4.7 (Low).
| Metric | Grok 4.7 (Low) | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.2 | 55.1 | +30.6% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 30.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,630.69 | $3,117.31 | +91.2% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 91.2% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.90s | 49.55s | +284.1% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 284.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Grok 4.7 (Low): 30.6% more intelligence, 91.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 284.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.7 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Kimi K3.1 Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Grok 4.7 (Low)Kimi K3.1 ProToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-low/kimi-k3-1-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-low/kimi-k3-1-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill