Grok 4.7 (Low) vs Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.7 (Low) by SpaceXAI or Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (Low) scores 2.6 points higher (42.2 vs 39.6) but costs 1.2× as much to run the benchmark ($1631 vs $1385; both premium class). Pick Grok 4.7 (Low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh).
| Metric | Grok 4.7 (Low) | Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.2 | 39.6 | −6.2% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 6.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,630.69 | $1,385.40 | −15.0% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 15.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.28s | 20.85s | +84.8% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 84.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) vs Grok 4.7 (Low): 6.2% less intelligence, 15.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 84.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.7 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Grok 4.7 (Low)Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-low/muse-spark-1-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-low/muse-spark-1-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill