Grok 4.7 (Low) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.7 (Low) by SpaceXAI or Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) scores 5.9 points higher (48.1 vs 42.2) but costs 1.2× as much to run the benchmark ($2000 vs $1631; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Grok 4.7 (Low).
| Metric | Grok 4.7 (Low) | Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.2 | 48.1 | +14.0% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 14.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,630.69 | $2,000.35 | +22.7% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 22.7% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 10.72s | 63.86s | +495.7% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 495.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) vs Grok 4.7 (Low): 14.0% more intelligence, 22.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 495.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.7 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Grok 4.7 (Low)Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-low/muse-spark-1-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-low/muse-spark-1-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill