Grok 4.7 (Low) vs Qwen3.7 Max
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.7 (Low) by SpaceXAI or Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Grok 4.7 (Low)
Qwen3.7 Max vs Grok 4.7 (Low): 30.1% less intelligence, 39.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 48.0% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Grok 4.7 (Low) | Qwen3.7 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.2 | 29.5 | −30.1% Qwen3.7 Max is 30.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,630.69 | $2,277.12 | +39.6% Qwen3.7 Max is 39.6% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.26s | 16.67s | +48.0% Qwen3.7 Max is 48.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $2.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.7 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
Grok 4.7 (Low)Qwen3.7 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-low/qwen3-7-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-low/qwen3-7-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill