Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) vs Grok 4.7 (High)
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) by SpaceXAI or Grok 4.7 (High) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) scores 0.1 points higher (46.4 vs 46.3) but costs 1.3× as much to run the benchmark ($4967 vs $3881; both flagship class). Pick Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Grok 4.7 (High).
| Metric | Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) | Grok 4.7 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 46.4 | 46.3 | −0.2% Grok 4.7 (High) is 0.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,967.35 | $3,880.88 | −21.9% Grok 4.7 (High) is 21.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 40.31s | 25.34s | −37.1% Grok 4.7 (High) is 37.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (High) vs Grok 4.7 (Xhigh): 0.2% less intelligence, 21.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 37.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Grok 4.7 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
Grok 4.7 (Xhigh)Grok 4.7 (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7/grok-4-7-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7/grok-4-7-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill