Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) vs Hy3
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) by SpaceXAI or Hy3 by Tencent? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) scores 21.1 points higher (46.4 vs 25.3) but costs 33× as much to run the benchmark ($4967 vs $150; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 25.3, and Hy3 when 25.3 is enough.
| Metric | Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) | Hy3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 46.4 | 25.3 | −45.5% Hy3 is 45.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,967.35 | $149.61 | −97.0% Hy3 is 97.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 35.66s | 33.13s | −7.1% Hy3 is 7.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.14 / $0.56 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Hy3 vs Grok 4.7 (Xhigh): 45.5% less intelligence, 97.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 7.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Hy3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
Grok 4.7 (Xhigh)Hy3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7/hy3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7/hy3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill