Hy3 vs Llama 4 Maverick
Which is better for the money: Hy3 by Tencent or Llama 4 Maverick by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Hy3 scores 16.0 points higher (25.3 vs 9.3) but costs 3.4× as much to run the benchmark ($150 vs $44.0; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Hy3 when you need intelligence above 9.3, and Llama 4 Maverick when 9.3 is enough.
| Metric | Hy3 | Llama 4 Maverick | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.3 | 9.3 | −63.2% Llama 4 Maverick is 63.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $149.61 | $43.98 | −70.6% Llama 4 Maverick is 70.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 33.13s | 10.94s | −67.0% Llama 4 Maverick is 67.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.56 | $0.25 / $0.92 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Llama 4 Maverick vs Hy3: 63.2% less intelligence, 70.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 67.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Hy3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Llama 4 Maverick is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
Hy3Llama 4 MaverickToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/hy3/llama-4-maverick · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/hy3/llama-4-maverick?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill