Hy3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Which is better for the money: Hy3 by Tencent or MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Hy3: 49.8% more intelligence, 26.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 48.8% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Hy3 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.3 | 37.9 | +49.8% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 49.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $149.61 | $109.55 | −26.8% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 26.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 33.29s | 49.53s | +48.8% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 48.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.56 | $0.14 / $0.28 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Hy3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Hy3MiMo-V2.6-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/hy3/mimo-v2-6-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/hy3/mimo-v2-6-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill