Hy3 vs Ministral 3 14B
Which is better for the money: Hy3 by Tencent or Ministral 3 14B by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Hy3 scores 19.3 points higher (25.3 vs 6.0) but costs 4.0× as much to run the benchmark ($150 vs $37.6; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Hy3 when you need intelligence above 6.0, and Ministral 3 14B when 6.0 is enough.
| Metric | Hy3 | Ministral 3 14B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.3 | 6.0 | −76.3% Ministral 3 14B is 76.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $149.61 | $37.56 | −74.9% Ministral 3 14B is 74.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 33.69s | 7.87s | −76.6% Ministral 3 14B is 76.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.56 | $0.20 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Ministral 3 14B vs Hy3: 76.3% less intelligence, 74.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 76.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Hy3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Ministral 3 14B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
Hy3Ministral 3 14BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/hy3/ministral-3-14b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/hy3/ministral-3-14b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill