Hy3 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Which is better for the money: Hy3 by Tencent or Qwen3.8 Max (0902) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) scores 20.1 points higher (45.4 vs 25.3) but costs 33× as much to run the benchmark ($4935 vs $150; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.8 Max (0902) when you need intelligence above 25.3, and Hy3 when 25.3 is enough.
| Metric | Hy3 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.3 | 45.4 | +79.4% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 79.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $149.61 | $4,934.79 | +3198.4% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 33× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 33.29s | 63.23s | +89.9% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 89.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.56 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Hy3: 79.4% more intelligence, 3198.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 89.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Hy3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Hy3Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/hy3/qwen3-8-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/hy3/qwen3-8-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill