Inkling 2 Small vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
Which is better for the money: Inkling 2 Small by Thinking Machines or Kimi K3.1 Pro by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-06.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 15.9 points higher (46.5 vs 30.6) but costs 4.0× as much to run the benchmark ($3153 vs $792; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K3.1 Pro when you need intelligence above 30.6, and Inkling 2 Small when 30.6 is enough.
| Metric | Inkling 2 Small | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 30.6 | 46.5 | +52.0% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 52.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $791.81 | $3,152.80 | +298.2% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 4.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 20.92s | 96.39s | +360.8% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 360.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.00 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Inkling 2 Small: 52.0% more intelligence, 298.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 360.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Inkling 2 Small is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 52.50 for $718.
- Kimi K3.1 Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.60 for $1124.
Inkling 2 SmallKimi K3.1 ProToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/inkling-2-small/kimi-k3-1-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/inkling-2-small/kimi-k3-1-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill