Kimi K2.7 Code vs MiMo-V2.5
Which is better for the money: Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi or MiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 4.0 points higher (25.8 vs 21.8) but costs 16× as much to run the benchmark ($993 vs $61.9; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K2.7 Code when you need intelligence above 21.8, and MiMo-V2.5 when 21.8 is enough.
| Metric | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.8 | 21.8 | −15.5% MiMo-V2.5 is 15.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $992.88 | $61.93 | −93.8% MiMo-V2.5 is 93.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 46.75s | 41.73s | −10.7% MiMo-V2.5 is 10.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.95 / $4.00 | $0.13 / $0.27 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text, Image |
MiMo-V2.5 vs Kimi K2.7 Code: 15.5% less intelligence, 93.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 10.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- MiMo-V2.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
Kimi K2.7 CodeMiMo-V2.5Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/mimo-v2-5-0424 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/mimo-v2-5-0424?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill