Kimi K2.7 Code vs Qwen3.8 27B (Low)
Which is better for the money: Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi or Qwen3.8 27B (Low) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 27B (Low) scores 0.4 points higher (26.2 vs 25.8) but costs 1.1× as much to run the benchmark ($1060 vs $993; both premium class). Pick Qwen3.8 27B (Low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Kimi K2.7 Code.
| Metric | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.8 27B (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.8 | 26.2 | +1.6% Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is 1.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $992.88 | $1,060.08 | +6.8% Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is 6.8% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 46.45s | 55.01s | +18.4% Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is 18.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.95 / $4.00 | $0.50 / $3.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 27B (Low) vs Kimi K2.7 Code: 1.6% more intelligence, 6.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 18.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Qwen3.8 27B (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Kimi K2.7 CodeQwen3.8 27B (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/qwen3-8-27b-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/qwen3-8-27b-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill