Kimi K2.7 Code vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Which is better for the money: Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi or Qwen3.8 Max (0902) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) scores 19.6 points higher (45.4 vs 25.8) but costs 5.0× as much to run the benchmark ($4935 vs $993; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.8 Max (0902) when you need intelligence above 25.8, and Kimi K2.7 Code when 25.8 is enough.
| Metric | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.8 | 45.4 | +76.0% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 76.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $992.88 | $4,934.79 | +397.0% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 5.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 46.75s | 63.23s | +35.3% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 35.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.95 / $4.00 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text, Image |
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Kimi K2.7 Code: 76.0% more intelligence, 397.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 35.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Kimi K2.7 CodeQwen3.8 Max (0902)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/qwen3-8-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/qwen3-8-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill