Kimi K2.7 Code vs Qwen3.8 Max
Which is better for the money: Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi or Qwen3.8 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-07.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 Max scores 15.1 points higher (58.1 vs 43.0) but costs 3.2× as much to run the benchmark ($1741 vs $545; both premium class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.8 Max when you need intelligence above 43.0, and Kimi K2.7 Code when 43.0 is enough.
| Metric | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.8 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.0 | 58.1 | +35.1% Qwen3.8 Max is 35.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $544.58 | $1,741.41 | +219.8% Qwen3.8 Max is 3.2× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 66.82s | 39.46s | −40.9% Qwen3.8 Max is 40.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.95 / $4.00 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Qwen3.8 Max vs Kimi K2.7 Code: 35.1% more intelligence, 219.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 40.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
- Qwen3.8 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Sol (xhigh) scores 59.00 for $1525.
Kimi K2.7 CodeQwen3.8 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/qwen3-8-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/qwen3-8-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill