Kimi K2.7 Code vs Beam 1.0
Which is better for the money: Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi or Beam 1.0 by Reflection? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Beam 1.0
Beam 1.0 vs Kimi K2.7 Code: 17.4% more intelligence, 67.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 82.8% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Kimi K2.7 Code | Beam 1.0 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.8 | 30.3 | +17.4% Beam 1.0 is 17.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $992.88 | $318.73 | −67.9% Beam 1.0 is 67.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 46.75s | 8.02s | −82.8% Beam 1.0 is 82.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.95 / $4.00 | $0.40 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Beam 1.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Kimi K2.7 CodeBeam 1.0Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/reflection-beam · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/reflection-beam?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill