Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Llama 4 Maverick
Which is better for the money: Kimi K3.1 Pro by Kimi or Llama 4 Maverick by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 45.8 points higher (55.1 vs 9.3) but costs 71× as much to run the benchmark ($3117 vs $44.0; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K3.1 Pro when you need intelligence above 9.3, and Llama 4 Maverick when 9.3 is enough.
| Metric | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Llama 4 Maverick | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 55.1 | 9.3 | −83.1% Llama 4 Maverick is 83.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,117.31 | $43.98 | −98.6% Llama 4 Maverick is 98.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 49.55s | 10.41s | −79.0% Llama 4 Maverick is 79.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.25 / $0.92 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Llama 4 Maverick vs Kimi K3.1 Pro: 83.1% less intelligence, 98.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 79.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K3.1 Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Llama 4 Maverick is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
Kimi K3.1 ProLlama 4 MaverickToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3-1-pro/llama-4-maverick · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3-1-pro/llama-4-maverick?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill