Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Which is better for the money: Kimi K3.1 Pro by Kimi or MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 8.8 points higher (55.1 vs 46.3) but costs 15× as much to run the benchmark ($3117 vs $207; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K3.1 Pro when you need intelligence above 46.3, and MiMo-V2.6-Pro when 46.3 is enough.
| Metric | Kimi K3.1 Pro | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 55.1 | 46.3 | −16.0% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 16.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,117.31 | $206.66 | −93.4% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 93.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 44.78s | 44.97s | +0.4% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 0.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.43 / $0.87 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Kimi K3.1 Pro: 16.0% less intelligence, 93.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 0.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K3.1 Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Kimi K3.1 ProMiMo-V2.6-ProToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3-1-pro/mimo-v2-6-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3-1-pro/mimo-v2-6-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill