Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Which is better for the money: Kimi K3.1 Pro by Kimi or Qwen3.8 Max (0902) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Kimi K3.1 Pro
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Kimi K3.1 Pro: 17.6% less intelligence, 58.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 48.3% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 55.1 | 45.4 | −17.6% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 17.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,117.31 | $4,934.79 | +58.3% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 58.3% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 42.64s | 63.23s | +48.3% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 48.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K3.1 Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Kimi K3.1 ProQwen3.8 Max (0902)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3-1-pro/qwen3-8-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3-1-pro/qwen3-8-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill