Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Kimi K3.1 Pro by Kimi or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 45.9 points higher (55.1 vs 9.2) but costs 7.7× as much to run the benchmark ($3117 vs $405; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K3.1 Pro when you need intelligence above 9.2, and Qwen3 Coder Next when 9.2 is enough.
| Metric | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 55.1 | 9.2 | −83.3% Qwen3 Coder Next is 83.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,117.31 | $405.10 | −87.0% Qwen3 Coder Next is 87.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 42.64s | 6.44s | −84.9% Qwen3 Coder Next is 84.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.31 / $1.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Kimi K3.1 Pro: 83.3% less intelligence, 87.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 84.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K3.1 Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Kimi K3.1 ProQwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3-1-pro/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3-1-pro/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill