Kimi K3 (Low) vs MiMo-V2.5
Which is better for the money: Kimi K3 (Low) by Kimi or MiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3 (Low) scores 8.3 points higher (30.1 vs 21.8) but costs 19× as much to run the benchmark ($1190 vs $61.9; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K3 (Low) when you need intelligence above 21.8, and MiMo-V2.5 when 21.8 is enough.
| Metric | Kimi K3 (Low) | MiMo-V2.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 30.1 | 21.8 | −27.6% MiMo-V2.5 is 27.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,190.42 | $61.93 | −94.8% MiMo-V2.5 is 94.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 66.33s | 41.73s | −37.1% MiMo-V2.5 is 37.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $3.00 / $15.0 | $0.13 / $0.27 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
MiMo-V2.5 vs Kimi K3 (Low): 27.6% less intelligence, 94.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 37.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K3 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- MiMo-V2.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
Kimi K3 (Low)MiMo-V2.5Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3-low/mimo-v2-5-0424 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3-low/mimo-v2-5-0424?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill