Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Which is better for the money: Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 by InclusionAI or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 scores 17.4 points higher (43.9 vs 26.5) but costs 5.4× as much to run the benchmark ($1552 vs $286; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 when you need intelligence above 26.5, and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL when 26.5 is enough.
| Metric | Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.9 | 26.5 | −39.6% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 39.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,551.81 | $286.07 | −81.6% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 81.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 6.31s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $0.90 | $0.23 / $0.57 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Ling 3.1 Flash 1019: 39.6% less intelligence, 81.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019Nemotron 3.5 Super VLToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/ling-3-1-flash-1019/nemotron-3-5-super-vl · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/ling-3-1-flash-1019/nemotron-3-5-super-vl?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill