Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 by InclusionAI or Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 scores 21.0 points higher (43.9 vs 22.9) but costs 2.6× as much to run the benchmark ($1552 vs $596; both premium class). Pick Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning).
| Metric | Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 | Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.9 | 22.9 | −47.8% Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B… is 47.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,551.81 | $596.33 | −61.6% Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B… is 61.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 15.29s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $0.90 | $0.60 / $2.70 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) vs Ling 3.1 Flash 1019: 47.8% less intelligence, 61.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/ling-3-1-flash-1019/nvidia-nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/ling-3-1-flash-1019/nvidia-nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill