Llama 4 Maverick vs Llama 4 Scout
Which is better for the money: Llama 4 Maverick by Meta or Llama 4 Scout by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Llama 4 Maverick
Llama 4 Scout vs Llama 4 Maverick: 30.1% less intelligence, 67.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 53.8% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Llama 4 Maverick | Llama 4 Scout | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 9.3 | 6.5 | −30.1% Llama 4 Scout is 30.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $43.98 | $73.56 | +67.3% Llama 4 Scout is 67.3% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.18s | 5.16s | −53.8% Llama 4 Scout is 53.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $0.92 | $0.18 / $0.66 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Llama 4 Maverick is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
- Llama 4 Scout is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) scores 34.60 for $66.8.
Llama 4 MaverickLlama 4 ScoutToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/llama-4-maverick/llama-4-scout · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/llama-4-maverick/llama-4-scout?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill