Llama 4 Maverick vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Which is better for the money: Llama 4 Maverick by Meta or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL scores 17.2 points higher (26.5 vs 9.3) but costs 6.4× as much to run the benchmark ($283 vs $44.0; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Nemotron 3.5 Super VL when you need intelligence above 9.3, and Llama 4 Maverick when 9.3 is enough.
| Metric | Llama 4 Maverick | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 9.3 | 26.5 | +184.9% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 2.8× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $43.98 | $282.51 | +542.4% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 6.4× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 10.69s | 6.33s | −40.8% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 40.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $0.92 | $0.23 / $0.57 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Llama 4 Maverick: 184.9% more intelligence, 542.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 40.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Llama 4 Maverick is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Llama 4 MaverickNemotron 3.5 Super VLToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/llama-4-maverick/nemotron-3-5-super-vl · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/llama-4-maverick/nemotron-3-5-super-vl?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill