Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Llama 4 Scout by Meta or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-07.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3 Coder Next scores 11.0 points higher (21.3 vs 10.3) but costs 22× as much to run the benchmark ($250 vs $11.6; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3 Coder Next when you need intelligence above 10.3, and Llama 4 Scout when 10.3 is enough.
| Metric | Llama 4 Scout | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 10.3 | 21.3 | +106.8% Qwen3 Coder Next is 2.1× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $11.60 | $250.18 | +2056.7% Qwen3 Coder Next is 22× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.45s | 5.28s | −3.1% Qwen3 Coder Next is 3.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.18 / $0.66 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Llama 4 Scout: 106.8% more intelligence, 2056.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 3.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Llama 4 Scout is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) scores 26.80 for $10.2.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
Llama 4 ScoutQwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/llama-4-scout/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/llama-4-scout/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill