Llama 4 Scout vs Solar Pro 4
Which is better for the money: Llama 4 Scout by Meta or Solar Pro 4 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Solar Pro 4 scores 20.1 points higher (26.6 vs 6.5) but costs 10× as much to run the benchmark ($737 vs $73.6; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Solar Pro 4 when you need intelligence above 6.5, and Llama 4 Scout when 6.5 is enough.
| Metric | Llama 4 Scout | Solar Pro 4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.5 | 26.6 | +309.2% Solar Pro 4 is 4.1× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $73.56 | $736.82 | +901.7% Solar Pro 4 is 10× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.06s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.18 / $0.66 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Solar Pro 4 vs Llama 4 Scout: 309.2% more intelligence, 901.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Llama 4 Scout is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) scores 34.60 for $66.8.
- Solar Pro 4 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Llama 4 ScoutSolar Pro 4Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/llama-4-scout/solar-pro4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/llama-4-scout/solar-pro4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill