LongCat 2.0 vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: LongCat 2.0 by LongCat or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Qwen3.7 Plus
Qwen3.7 Plus vs LongCat 2.0: 31.9% more intelligence, 21.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 30.1% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | LongCat 2.0 | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 19.1 | 25.2 | +31.9% Qwen3.7 Plus is 31.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $544.74 | $427.73 | −21.5% Qwen3.7 Plus is 21.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 35.51s | 46.20s | +30.1% Qwen3.7 Plus is 30.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $2.95 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- LongCat 2.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
LongCat 2.0Qwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/longcat-2-0/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/longcat-2-0/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill