Mercury 2.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Which is better for the money: Mercury 2.5 by Inception or MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Mercury 2.5: 276.4% more intelligence, 5.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 941.0% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Mercury 2.5 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 12.3 | 46.3 | +276.4% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 3.8× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $218.11 | $206.66 | −5.2% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 5.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 4.32s | 44.97s | +941.0% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 941.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $0.75 | $0.43 / $0.87 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Mercury 2.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Mercury 2.5MiMo-V2.6-ProToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mercury-2-5/mimo-v2-6-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mercury-2-5/mimo-v2-6-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill