Mercury 2 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Mercury 2 by Inception or MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) scores 15.2 points higher (26.0 vs 10.8) but costs 2.2× as much to run the benchmark ($231 vs $105; both mid-range class). Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Mercury 2.
| Metric | Mercury 2 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 10.8 | 26.0 | +140.7% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 2.4× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $104.94 | $231.08 | +120.2% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 2.2× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.65s | 49.58s | +645.6% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 645.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $0.75 | $0.41 / $1.02 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) vs Mercury 2: 140.7% more intelligence, 120.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 645.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Mercury 2 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) scores 37.80 for $94.1.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Mercury 2MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mercury-2/mimo-v2-5-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mercury-2/mimo-v2-5-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill