MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) vs Beam 1.0
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) by Xiaomi or Beam 1.0 by Reflection? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-23.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Beam 1.0 scores 4.3 points higher (30.3 vs 26.0) but costs 2.3× as much to run the benchmark ($319 vs $138; both mid-range class). Pick Beam 1.0 when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning).
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) | Beam 1.0 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.0 | 30.3 | +16.5% Beam 1.0 is 16.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $138.26 | $318.73 | +130.5% Beam 1.0 is 2.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 59.04s | 8.45s | −85.7% Beam 1.0 is 85.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.43 / $0.87 | $0.40 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Beam 1.0 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning): 16.5% more intelligence, 130.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 85.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Beam 1.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)Beam 1.0Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro/reflection-beam · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro/reflection-beam?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill