MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) vs Solar Pro 3
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) by Xiaomi or Solar Pro 3 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) scores 18.2 points higher (26.0 vs 7.8) but costs 1.5× as much to run the benchmark ($231 vs $159; both mid-range class). Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Solar Pro 3.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) | Solar Pro 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.0 | 7.8 | −70.0% Solar Pro 3 is 70.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $231.08 | $159.22 | −31.1% Solar Pro 3 is 31.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 49.58s | 18.89s | −61.9% Solar Pro 3 is 61.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.41 / $1.02 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Solar Pro 3 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning): 70.0% less intelligence, 31.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 61.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Solar Pro 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)Solar Pro 3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro/solar-pro-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro/solar-pro-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill