MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 30.1% less intelligence, 161.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 87.2% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 37.9 | 26.5 | −30.1% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 30.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $109.55 | $286.07 | +161.1% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 2.6× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 49.53s | 6.35s | −87.2% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 87.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.28 | $0.23 / $0.57 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
MiMo-V2.6-FlashNemotron 3.5 Super VLToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash/nemotron-3-5-super-vl · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash/nemotron-3-5-super-vl?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill