MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi or MiniMax-M3.1-Flash by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 7.8% less intelligence, 37.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 51.8% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 46.3 | 42.7 | −7.8% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 7.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $206.66 | $283.18 | +37.0% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 37.0% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 48.82s | 23.52s | −51.8% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 51.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.43 / $0.87 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
MiMo-V2.6-ProMiniMax-M3.1-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-pro/minimax-m3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-pro/minimax-m3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill