MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi or Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 60.3% less intelligence, 355.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 30.0% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 46.3 | 18.4 | −60.3% Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Re… is 60.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $206.66 | $940.97 | +355.3% Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Re… is 4.6× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 49.69s | 64.60s | +30.0% Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Re… is 30.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.43 / $0.87 | $0.60 / $3.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
MiMo-V2.6-ProQwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-pro/qwen3-5-397b-a17b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/mimo-v2-6-pro/qwen3-5-397b-a17b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill